United Nations Security Council Fails to Pass Resolution on Myanmar Conflict in 2025 - four years after the nations’ hostile takeover.

A motion aimed at resolving the ongoing Myanmar crisis has failed to pass in the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), following intense debate and discord among member states. The discussion, led primarily by representatives from Panama, China, and the United States, underscored deep divisions regarding the appropriate international response to Myanmar’s military rule and its humanitarian impact.

The crisis traces back to 2021, when Myanmar’s military, the Tatmadaw, staged a coup to overturn the results of a democratic election, claiming electoral fraud. Since seizing power, the junta has committed widespread human rights abuses, including imprisonment, torture, and murder of political opponents. Rebel groups have since emerged, resisting military rule, but efforts to support them—whether through aid or military intervention—have thus far been unsuccessful.

The recent UNSC discussions highlighted deep ideological divides between nations advocating for direct intervention and those opposing it. Tensions flared between China and Panama, requiring U.S. intervention to de-escalate the dispute.

China’s delegation emphasized a policy of non-intervention, arguing that imposing sanctions on the military regime would harm civilians rather than the junta itself. Instead, they pushed for diplomatic isolation and negotiations. A Chinese delegate explained: "We do not want Myanmar to experience the same suffering we did during our own internal conflicts. We believe diplomacy is the only way forward."

The United States, on the other hand, maintained a hardline stance against the junta, refusing to recognize its legitimacy. A U.S. delegate reaffirmed this position: "The junta had no right to seize power in 2021. We do not and will not recognize their claim to sovereignty."

Panama’s delegation aligned itself against sanctions but advocated for increased humanitarian aid, arguing that the junta’s control over Myanmar must be pragmatically acknowledged to ensure aid distribution. However, they also expressed skepticism toward China’s motivations, suggesting that China's policies were self-serving.

Representatives from Guyana and South Korea also voiced their concerns about the humanitarian crisis. Guyana’s delegate, Luke Sherman, emphasized the need for democracy restoration and protection of minority rights: "Every person should have the right to choose their leaders. Right now, Myanmar’s minorities are completely disregarded."

South Korea focused on direct humanitarian assistance through NGOs and proposed "Project Reform," a program aimed at funding medical aid and securing safe zones for civilians. "We are working with neighboring countries to increase refugee intake and ensure victims receive medical attention."

With two failed resolutions and no unified approach, the UNSC remains at an impasse. The international community must now navigate growing instability in Myanmar as civilian casualties continue to rise. While some nations push for stronger diplomatic measures, others argue that real change cannot occur without direct action.

With an abundance of in fighting during the committee, potential solution to the conflict seemed far away period however, by the end of the unmoderated caucus, he makes you feel to address the problem and some capacity was made; but not everybody agreed with this potential solution period Panama challenge the American supported bill, and minimal resolution was offered, said the delegation. Overall, while the issue has been somewhat addressed, it is clear that there is still a long way to go in regards to resolving the Myanmar crisis period